References and evidence base

References behind Road Risk

References support the method, interpretation, technical implementation, and limitations of the model. They do not imply endorsement or official status.

Source-to-feature map

Which sources support which public features

Page Purpose

Source-to-feature map

Use this map before the reference register. It explains why each source group appears in the project.

Method and formulas
Physics, road-safety interpretation, geometry, and scenario assumptions.
Map and routing
OpenStreetMap-derived geometry, MapTiler rendering, and OpenRouteService where configured.
Observed context
RSA Recorded Collisions are cited as historical source data, not model output or endorsement.
Public evidence
Reviewed Results cases, validation boundaries, and source acknowledgements support transparent review.

Source use

Sources support the method, not official status

Reference boundary

Road Risk uses references to guide modelling and interpretation. They do not validate specific app outputs as real-world crash risk.

Research Boundary

The current app remains a student research system, not an official assessment standard or safety-rating system.

Most important sources

Sources judges should understand first

Method context
AASHTO / Highway Safety Manual

Supports the general safety-analysis framing and the need to distinguish analysis context from direct prediction.

Formula context
Vehicle dynamics texts

Provide background for interpreting vehicle motion, friction, turning demand, and stopping-related physical relationships.

Infrastructure context
TII, EU Directive, iRAP, and PIARC

Provide network-assessment and infrastructure-safety context without making Road Risk an official standard.

Data and technical
OSM, Overpass, Leaflet, MapTiler, OpenRouteService

Support the public-data and mapping implementation, including volunteered geographic information limitations.

Observed context
Road Safety Authority collision context

Supports historical collision-context comparison while preserving the boundary that RSA records do not prove Road Risk model outputs.

Weather and behaviour
Weather, visibility, and behaviour sources

Support why adverse conditions and behavioural assumptions matter, while not proving any specific app output is real-world crash risk.

Reference register

Initial structured reference groups

CategoryReference groupSupports
Books and core methodAASHTO Highway Safety ManualRoad-safety method context and safety-analysis framing.
Books and core methodRajamani, Vehicle Dynamics and ControlVehicle-dynamics background for friction, turning demand, and stopping relationships.
Infrastructure guidanceTII, EU Directive 2008/96/EC, iRAP, and PIARCRoad infrastructure safety-management and assessment context without making Road Risk an official standard.
Geometry and human factorsGeometric design, curve, and human-factors sourcesContext for interpreting curvature, visibility, and road-form mechanisms.
Open map dataOpenStreetMap, Overpass API, Haklay, and OSMnxPublic-data use, volunteered geographic information, and road-network analysis context.
Weather and behaviourQiu and Nixon, Stevens et al., Eisenberg and Warner, Abdel-Aty et al.Evidence context for adverse weather, visibility, and behavioural sensitivity.
Technical documentationLeaflet, MapTiler, OpenRouteService, MathJaxImplementation references for mapping, route tools, isochrones, and mathematical notation.
RSA collision contextRoad Safety Authority collision statistics and collision-map source contextHistorical observed-collision context for comparison, calibration planning, source acknowledgement, and limitation wording.
Licensing and formatsOSM copyright, ODbL, RFC 7946, RFC 4180Attribution, database licensing, GeoJSON, and CSV context.

Feedback context

Feedback and guidance without endorsement claims

CategoryContextHow it is used
Academic feedbackTransport planning review contextFeedback helped with transparency, legitimacy, scientific presentation, and infrastructure variables.
Road-safety contextRSA guidanceAssistance helped with responsible communication and data-related framing.
Policy contextEuropean Commission DG MOVEPolicy context includes Directive 2008/96/EC and network-wide assessment concepts.
Research materialsNHTSA sourcesResearch materials form part of the wider road-safety evidence background.